Q&A – Politicians and Public Decision-Makers
1. Can this project really improve public health?
Yes – and in a measurable, long-term way. Strength training simultaneously works on:
metabolic health (diabetes, obesity),
circulatory system (blood pressure, heart),
skeletal system (osteoporosis, fractures),
nervous system (depression, stress),
quality of life and independence.
It is the cheapest and most universal health intervention.
2. Does the implementation of the project require huge financial outlays?
No – the project relies on infrastructure that already exists: schools. Unit costs (e.g., one TYTAX training module) are many times lower than treating the effects of lack of strength:
hospitalizations,
medicines,
rehabilitation,
incapacity for work.
This is an investment that pays off faster than road or sports infrastructure.
3. Is implementation possible at the local level – e.g. in a commune or district?
Yes – and the best place to start is at the local level. A municipality can:
introduce a School Dream Gym in one or more schools,
use existing rooms,
train staff,
include seniors and parents.
This is a model of a local biological health center – built around a school.
4. Is the project aligned with public health and education priorities?
Yes – 100%. It aligns with the goals:
health promotion,
prevention of lifestyle diseases,
health education,
activation of local communities.
This is a project that integrates sectoral policies within a single, coherent strategy.
5. Is society “ready” for such a project?
Yes – the data shows that:
parents want their children to be stronger and healthier,
teachers are looking for a new formula for physical education,
Seniors want to exercise, but they have nowhere to do so.
The resistance isn't in society—it's in the lack of structure. The project provides it.
6. Can the project's effects be measured?
Yes, thanks:
tests of strength and health,
Passport of Strength,
applications,
comparative indicators (before/after, school/school, commune/commune).
This is a project with a built-in system for monitoring its effects – health, educational and social.
7. Is strength training the right direction for schools and public policy?
Yes – because it's not about "gym," but about strengthening the biological foundations of children and young people. This isn't a sports trend. It's a response to:
obesity,
depression,
poor posture,
lack of energy,
screen addiction.
This is a strategy for the future – not only educational, but also civilizational.
8. Could this project have electoral/image implications?
Yes – this is the project:
positive,
apolitical,
easy for social communication,
bringing real benefits to families, children, schools and seniors.
A politician who supports this project shows that he or she understands health, education, and long-term social interests.
9. Can the project be scaled to a national or European level?
Yes – it is based on:
universal biology,
existing infrastructure,
ready-made digital and educational tools.
It can be implemented: on a voivodeship or national scale, as a component of EU programs (Horizon, EU4Health, Erasmus+).
This is a model for replication – not an experiment.
10. How to start implementation in your municipality, city, region?
Choose one school as a pilot,
contact the project team,
organize a meeting with the principal, teacher, physiotherapist,
propose the purchase of a basic kit and staff training,
After 3 months, collect data and plan expansion.