top of page
  • TikTok
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Artboard 1
schoolgymdream_1.png
schoolgymdream_2.png

      Why is strength training for children so challenging?

      young-boy-lifting-weights-in-front-of-red-wooden-w-2025-08-11-09-46-31-utc.jpg

      Executive Summary

      • Strength training in school education (conducted competently and under supervision) is one of the safest and most effective forms of developing health and fitness [1–4].

      • It debunks myths: it does not “stun growth” , it does not “damage joints” ; on the contrary, it supports the health of the musculoskeletal system and metabolism [1,3,7–9].

      • It strengthens basic movement patterns, posture, self-confidence and reduces the risk of injuries in other activities (e.g. team sports) [1,7,10–11].

      • It is inclusive: children with different levels of ability (including overweight/obese) experience an early sense of agency and success [8–9].

      • Recommended frequency: 2–3 units per week of 20–40 minutes of resistance work; muscle and bone strengthening exercises at least 3 days per week [2–6].

      • Conditions for success: qualifications of the instructor, supervision, technique over weight, progression in small steps, clear room rules and monitoring of progress [2–4].

      1. Social paradox: "gymnastics – yes, gym – no?"

      In the popular mindset, gymnastics is a natural part of physical education, while the "gym" is often perceived as a space for adults. The phrase "strength training for children" evokes reservations, even resistance.

      Meanwhile, contemporary guidelines and reviews prove that properly conducted resistance training at school brings significant benefits and may be characterized by low injury rates [1–4,7].

      • Lack of knowledge about modern resistance training for children and adolescents and about the difference between physical education and strength sports [1–4].

      • False beliefs: "it stunts growth" , "it damages joints" , "it is too heavy" - not supported by evidence, especially when properly supervised [1,3].

      • Media associations with bodybuilding and doping that are not applicable for educational and health purposes [2–4].

      2. Sources of resistance: stereotypes, ignorance, associations

      3. What does the research say?

      • Safety: with qualified supervision and proper technique the risk of injury is low [1–4,7].

      • Health effects: improved body composition, insulin sensitivity, bone mineral density, posture and well-being [3,7–9].

      • Transfer: lower risk of injuries in sports and physical activities due to better movement control and force [1,7,10–11].

      The greatest risk isn't resistance exercise itself, but rather a lack of supervision and inadequate motor skills. Well-designed school programs prioritize technique and progressive load, small-group work, and clear safety protocols.

      The literature emphasizes that most injuries result from organizational errors and not from the nature of strength training [1,3,7].

      4. Security and real risk

      5. Myths and facts

      • Myth: “Strength training stunts growth.” Fact: No evidence of negative effects when properly managed; pediatric guidelines allow and recommend resistance training at a young age [1,3].

      • Myth: “It damages joints.” Fact: It improves movement control and stability, reducing the risk of overuse injuries [1,7].

      • Myth: "It's bodybuilding." Fact: School strength training is about educating people about movement patterns and health, not competitive sport [2–4].

      • Frequency and dose: 2–3 units per week of 20–40 minutes of resistance work, integrated with physical education or extra-curricular activities [2–6].

      • Lesson structure: dynamic warm-up → pattern block (push, pull, squat, hip hinge, stabilization) → cool-down; progression in small steps (e.g. +1–2 kg or an additional set every 1–2 weeks) [2–4].

      • Supervision and qualifications: instructor with pedagogical training and S&C competencies; low student:teacher ratio; clear room rules and operating standards (SOP) [2–4].

      • Inclusiveness: tasks adapted to the level of ability and stage of development, with clear progress criteria [2–4].

      6. How to implement strength training at school?

      7. Special benefits for overweight/obese students

      Resistance training allows you to quickly experience movement success without the need for long-term continuous effort, which improves motivation and self-esteem.

      Studies indicate a significant improvement in metabolic parameters in overweight adolescents after strength or combined programs [8–9].

      Incorporating strength and neuromotor skills (stabilization, landing, braking) reduces the risk of injury. Controlled studies have demonstrated a reduction in injuries in children playing football [10–11].

      8. Reducing injuries in sports games and activities

      9. Recommendations for schools and policymakers

      1. Equip schools with safe, modular resistance training rooms adapted to children's height and abilities [2–4].

      2. Provide training for PE teachers in the teaching of movement patterns and the basics of S&C [2–4].

      3. Include resistance training in the core PE curriculum (at least 2 units per week) [2–6].

      4. Monitor students’ progress using simple indicators (RPE/RIR, training diary) and assess the quality of the patterns’ performance every semester [2–4].

      10. Summary and Call to Action

      School strength training is not an extravagance—it is a necessary part of modern health education.

      It gives children the tools for life: strength, agency, movement habits and resilience.

      In the light of scientific evidence and international recommendations, its development in schools should be a priority of public health and education policy [1–6].

      FAQ
      -

      1. Does strength training “stun growth” in children?

      No. Well-designed and supervised programs do not adversely affect growth plates or linear growth. This myth stems from confusing competitive sports with educational strength training and from past reports of injuries in the absence of supervision. Current pediatric recommendations and expert consensus clearly emphasize safety and benefits—provided proper technique, grading, and instructor qualifications are used [1–3].

      FAQ
      -

      2. At what age can you start?

      There is no "magic" lower age limit; what matters is readiness to learn the technique and the ability to cooperate with the instructor. Early school-age children can perform resistance exercises using body weight, resistance bands, light dumbbells, or equipment adapted to their height. The key elements are supervision, technique, small doses of stimulus, and the enjoyment of movement. As they grow older, the difficulty can be gradually increased and free weight training can be incorporated [1–4].

      FAQ
      -

      3. Is it safe at school?

      Yes—with qualified supervision, injury rates are low, often lower than in popular team sports. Reviews show that most injuries result from a lack of supervision or technique, not from the nature of the resistance exercises themselves. Working in small groups, monitoring progress, and establishing clear room rules are good practices [1–3,7].

      FAQ
      -

      4. What does the child gain from this - apart from "strength" ?

      Better movement control, posture, and coordination; reduced risk of injury in other activities; metabolic benefits (body composition, insulin sensitivity), and a positive impact on well-being and a sense of agency. In schools, resistance training can be combined with elements of speed, jumping, and mobility—a multi-component model [1–4,6–9].

      FAQ
      -

      5. Strength training vs. bodybuilding/ "heavy weights" - what's the difference?

      School strength training is a movement-based education: we teach patterns (pushing, pulling, squatting, lunging, hip hinge, stabilization), technique, and progression, usually with moderate loads. Strength sports (weightlifting/powerlifting) are competitive and require specific protocols—they can be included in classes only after the foundations have been established. Bodybuilding (focusing on hypertrophy) is not the goal of school education [2–4].

      FAQ
      -

      6. How often and how long should I train at school?

      In practice, 2–3 units per week of 20–40 minutes of pure resistance work, either as part of physical education or during extracurricular activities, are sufficient. We use 1–3 sets of 6–12 repetitions per movement/pattern, at a controlled tempo, with a 2–3 repetition reserve (RIR). We always begin with a dynamic warm-up and end with a cool-down. Consistency and keeping a progress journal are important [2–6].

      FAQ
      -

      7. Is it allowed to test 1RM in adolescents?

      Maximal testing should only be considered for adolescents with adequate technical experience and under close supervision; alternatives include estimation from submaximal repetitions. The literature demonstrates good reliability of selected maximal tests in adolescents, but schools do not need to use them on a daily basis—RPE/RIR estimates and indices are sufficient for programming [1–3].

      FAQ
      -

      8. Should girls also do strength training?

      Absolutely. International recommendations for girls and boys are identical: ≥60 minutes of exercise daily, with muscle- and bone-strengthening activities at least three days a week. Strength training supports bone mineral density, fitness, and self-confidence—this is especially important during a growth spurt [5–6].

      FAQ
      -

      9. What about overweight/obese students?

      For many of them, resistance training is the best introduction to exercise—they feel empowered sooner than during long runs, and studies show improved insulin sensitivity and body composition. It's worth building on early successes: simple patterns, short sets, and frequent praise for technique. Over time, we incorporate aerobic elements [8–9].

      FAQ
      -

      10. Will strength training reduce injuries in team sports?

      Yes, strength and neuromotor skills (stabilization, landing, braking) reduce injury rates. In children's football, the FIFA 11+ Kids program has demonstrated a significant reduction in injuries compared to a standard warm-up; similar conclusions apply to many sports if we implement consistent preventive modules [10–11].

      FAQ
      -

      10. What qualifications should a teacher/facilitator have?

      The instructor should be familiar with pediatric movement didactics, able to teach technique, select progressions, and monitor fatigue and safety. S&C certifications (e.g., NSCA) are helpful, but pedagogical practice and working with low group:instructor ratios remain key. For schools, it's worth developing a classroom operating standard (SOP) and annual training [2–4].

      FAQ
      -

      10. Are medical examinations necessary?

      Healthy children typically do not require specific testing just to begin resistance training. However, the AAP identifies groups that require consultation (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, seizure disorders, selected cardiomyopathies, previous anthracycline therapy)—in these cases, a precautionary plan is necessary [3].

      FAQ
      -

      13. How to choose equipment and space in school?

      We prioritize modularity and safety: adjustable benches, resistance bands, small-increment dumbbells, youth barbells, safety cages, non-slip surfaces, clear signage, and access to sinks and ventilation. Classes can be conducted as "stations" and accommodate groups of varying fitness levels [2–4].

      FAQ
      -

      14. How to arrange the first lesson?

      30–40 minute structure: (1) 6–8 minute warm-up (jumping jacks, mobility), (2) 20–25 minute pattern block (e.g., band squat, pull-up, push-up, 10–15 kg barbell/stick deadlift , farmers carry ), (3) 5–7 minute cool-down. We record RPE/RIR, teach the principles of belaying and putting away equipment. Progression: +1–2 kg or +1 set every 1–2 weeks if technique is clean [2–4].

      Bibliography

      1. Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(7):498–505. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092952.

      2. Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJR, et al. Youth resistance training: updated position statement paper from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(5 Suppl):S60–S79. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819df407.

      3. Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Resistance Training for Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6):e20201011. Available from: https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/145/6/e20201011/76942.

      4. Lloyd RS, Cronin JB, Faigenbaum AD, et al. National Strength and Conditioning Association Position Statement on Long-Term Athletic Development. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(6):1491–1509. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001387.

      5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Child Activity: An Overview. 2024-01-08. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/physical-activity-basics/guidelines/children.html

      6. World Health Organization. Physical activity – Fact sheet. 2024-06-26. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity

      7. Faigenbaum AD, Myer GD. Resistance training among young athletes: safety, effectiveness and injury prevention effects. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(1):56–63. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.068098.

      8. Suh S, Jeong IK, Kim MY, et al. Effects of resistance training and aerobic exercise on insulin sensitivity in overweight adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Metab J 2011;35(4):418–426. doi:10.4093/dmj.2011.35.4.418.

      9. García-Hermoso A, Alonso-Martínez AM, Ramírez-Vélez R, et al. Exercise Interventions and Insulin Resistance in Children and Adolescents: A Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrician. 2023;177(12):1216–1228. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3870.

      10. Al Attar WSA, Alshewaier S, Clark CCT, et al. The FIFA 11+ Kids Injury Prevention Program Reduces Injuries in Children's Soccer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2023;15(6):747–757. doi:10.1177/19417381231189261.

      11. Ramos AP, Andrade AGP, Freitas GR, et al. FIFA 11+ KIDS in the prevention of soccer injuries in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JExerc Rehabil. 2024;20(2):71–80. doi:10.12965/jer.2346460.311.

      12. Pierce KC, Brewer C, Stone MH, et al. Weightlifting for Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review. Sports (Basel). 2021;9(12):172. doi:10.3390/sports9120172.

      bottom of page