Civilization on Mars, sarcopenia on Earth
We've built rockets that land on autonomous barges. We program robotic surgeons, edit genes, and send probes beyond Jupiter's orbit. Civilization can reach Mars.
And there is a generation of children growing up on Earth who cannot do pull-ups.
They're not "fat." They're invisible. They fit the BMI charts, but they don't meet the definition of health.
These are slim but weak children – without reserves, without muscular “armor”, without the foundation on which adulthood is built.
We look at weight and height and declare success.
Meanwhile, inside there is a deficit that cannot be seen: a lack of strength.
Children Who Cannot Be Seen
The system doesn't detect them because they don't look like a problem. They don't take up space in clinics or raise alarms on health checkups. They "manage" in PE because you can get through a lesson without a single meaningful stimulus to your muscles.
But they are the ones who will have the physiology of old people sooner than anyone else.
Their sarcopenia doesn't just "happen someday." It begins when muscle isn't built when it should be—during childhood and adolescence.
BMI tells us how much a child weighs. It doesn't tell us what that weight is made up of or what their body can do. They might be thin and metabolically fatigued. They might "look good" yet lack the strength to stabilize their spine, cushion their stride, or utilize glucose after a meal.
Muscles aren't aesthetic. Muscles are the organ of health— a storehouse, a pump, and a shock absorber all in one.
BMI is a filter through which health leaks
A window that cannot be opened a second time
"It'll catch up in adulthood" is a convenient lie. Adulthood is a time for repayment, not investment. Biology gives us the window of greatest susceptibility to adaptation precisely in childhood and adolescence. If we don't learn movement, build strength, and provide our bodies with stimulus then, everything later becomes more difficult, more expensive, and less effective.
Anyone who leaves school without a foundation of strength enters adulthood with a debt that will take decades to pay off with interest.
Why can't you see this?
Because muscle loss doesn't hurt. It doesn't turn blue. It doesn't make headlines. It's a silent deficit.
We don't measure it, so we pretend it's not there. The gradebook has grades in math and English, but there's no alphabet of movement.
There are knowledge tests, but no strength tests.
Can the student hang and pull himself up, even with help?
Can he do a deep squat with control?
Is he able to jump dynamically from a standing position and land stably?
Can he carry anything heavier than a backpack in his hands?
All it takes is a few simple questions:
These aren't sports trivia. THESE ARE HEALTH MILESTONES.
Civilization error
In school rankings, we count Olympians and exam averages. In country rankings, we count GDP and drones. We marvel at algorithms that identify faces in the stadium, yet we can't organize 10-meter horizontal bars in every school.
We buy technologies that are supposed to protect us, but we ignore the only technology that truly protects every human being from the inside: our own muscles.
It's not about competitive sports. It's about a child's RIGHT TO A STRONG BODY.
School Dream Gym – a primer, not a luxury
Imagine a school with a pull-up bar next to the blackboard. Where the teacher teaches squats like he teaches division.
In which every child has the right to progression – from a hang with a band to the first pull-up, from a squat with their own weight to safe work with a barbell.
This isn't a "gym" like a fitness club. It's a health studio.
Simple, durable equipment: assisted bars, dumbbells/kettlebells, 2–4 barbell stations, boxes, bands, medicine balls, push/pull sleds, mats.
Lessons arranged like math: learning movement → resistance progression → playing with movement.
Safety through competence: technique before the load, supervision, reasonable progression, load log.
Measurement, not selection: simple strength and power tests every 3–4 months to see the progress of each student – not to compare children, but to help them wisely.
What does this mean in practice?
Changing priorities
What's missing today isn't money. What's missing is willpower and a clear head.
A single school gym is a fraction of the cost of a single modern missile. The same as several smart boards.
Less than the annual cost of maintaining one superfighter per class.
If we truly care about the safety of our societies, let us start with the safety of our children's bodies.
New school primer
Every child has the right to three things:
1. A place - a workshop where he can safely build strength.
2. Master — a teacher who knows how to teach movement and program progression.
3. Measurements – simple, friendly tests that will show that the body is growing in competence just as the head is.
This is the new primer. Without it, all other textbooks will function half as well.
Call
Let's not ask children how much they weigh. Let's ask what their bodies can do. Let's teach them that strength isn't "for athletes," but for everyone.
Before we give them another screen, let's give them a pull-up bar. Before we send humans to Mars, let's teach our children to pull themselves into their own future.
Because a civilization that flies into space and is unable to build a strong man is taking the wrong direction.
Health begins with strength. Freedom begins with health. Everything begins with freedom.
FAQ
-
1. Czy wzmacnianie mięśni u dzieci jest bezpieczne?
Tak — przy odpowiednim nadzorze i progresji trening oporowy jest bezpieczny i skuteczny. Ryzyko urazu jest niskie i mniejsze niż w wielu grach zespołowych [2–3,8–9].
FAQ
-
2. Won't "lifting weights" harm your height?
Myth. There is no evidence that properly conducted resistance training inhibits growth or damages growth plates. Technique and supervision are key [2–3,8–9].
FAQ
-
3. Ile razy w tygodniu? Jak długo?
Wytyczne: ≥3 dni/tydz. aktywności wzmacniających mięśnie; praktycznie 2–3 sesje/tydz. po 45–60 min dają wyraźne efekty po ~8 tygodniach [1–3].
FAQ
-
4. Jakie są pierwsze, mierzalne korzyści?
Better strength and power, economy of movement, improved insulin sensitivity (even without weight loss), better bone mineralization and lower risk of injuries [10–12,20–21].
FAQ
-
5. Co mierzyć w szkole, żeby „widzieć” problem?
Zestaw ALPHA‑Fitness: dynamometr (chwyt), skok w dal, 20 m shuttle run, BMI i obwód pasa. Wyniki prezentujemy w percentylach dla wieku i płci [13–14].
FAQ
-
6. My child is slim - why does he need a gym?
Being thin does not guarantee health. The phenomenon of NWO (normal BMI, unfavorable body composition) and low strength exist as independent risk factors [14,18].
FAQ
-
7. Czy dziewczynki też powinny trenować siłowo?
Tak. Dziewczęta uzyskują znaczące przyrosty siły i stabilizacji, a trening oporowy jest elementem profilaktyki urazów oraz wsparcia zdrowia kości [3,5–6,20–21].
FAQ
-
8. Can the 1RM test be performed on adolescents?
Tak, w ocenie postępu, o ile technika jest opanowana i jest nadzór kompetentnej osoby. W programowaniu częściej korzystamy z submaksymalnych zakresów (np. 6–15 powt.) [2–3].
FAQ
-
9. Od czego zacząć w szkole bez siłowni?
Starting with assisted hangs/pull-ups, bodyweight squats, lunges, dumbbell farmer's walks, push/pull exercises (sleds/straps), and core work. Then gradually progress to barbells/kettlebells [3.5–6.8].
FAQ
-
10. Won't strength training "turn fat into muscle"?
No—they are different tissues. However, more muscle = greater energy expenditure and better glucose uptake, which promotes favorable body composition [18–19].
FAQ
-
11. How do we measure progress if we don't have a laboratory?
Repeat ALPHA-Fitness every 12–16 weeks. Additionally, track your plank time, number of perfect reps, and training load in your logbook [13–14].
FAQ
-
12. Dzieci z nadwagą: siła czy aerob?
Both components are valuable. In some adolescents, resistance training alone improved insulin sensitivity and reduced visceral fat [10–12].
FAQ
-
13. Minimum qualifications for a presenter?
Nauczyciel WF przeszkolony w metodyce treningu oporowego dzieci i młodzieży (wg AAP/NSCA) oraz BHP sprzętu; optymalnie 1 opiekun na 10–15 uczniów [2–4,8–9].
FAQ
-
14. Sprzęt — co absolutnie konieczne?
Drążki (z asystą), hantle/ketle, 2–4 stanowiska ze sztangą, gumy, piłki lekarskie, ławki, sanki/pasy, skrzynie, maty; do tego dynamometr do monitoringu [13–14].
FAQ
-
15. How to justify the cost?
This is a low-cost health investment in relation to public expenditure; for comparison: 1 Excalibur missile ~70–150 thousand USD, and annual O&S of the F‑35A ultimately ~6.8 million USD/vehicle [22–23].
Bibliography
1. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
2. World Health Organization. Physical activity (Fact sheet). 2024 Jun 26.
3. Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Resistance Training for Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2020;145(6):e20201011.
4. Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJR, Jeffreys I, Micheli LJ, Nitka M, Rowland TW. Youth resistance training: Updated position statement paper from the NSCA. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(5 Suppl):S60–S79.
5. Lloyd RS, Faigenbaum AD, Stone MH, Oliver JL, Jeffreys I, Moody JA, et al. Position statement on youth resistance training: the 2014 International Consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(7):498–505.
6. Lesinski M, Prieske O, Granacher U. Effects and dose–response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(13):781–95.
7. Slimani M, Paravlić A, Granacher U, et al. Strength training dose–response for lower-limb power in young athletes: meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1155.
8. Faigenbaum AD, Myer GD. Resistance training among young athletes: safety, effectiveness and injury prevention. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(1):56–63.
9. Myers AM, Beam NW, Fakhoury JD. Resistance training for children and adolescents. Transl Pediatrician. 2017;6(3):137–43.
10. Shaibi GQ, Cruz ML, Ball GDC, Weigensberg MJ, Salem GJ, Crespo NC, Goran MI. Effects of resistance training on insulin sensitivity in overweight Latino adolescent males. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(7):1208–15.
11. Davis JN, et al. Randomized control trial to improve adiposity and insulin sensitivity in overweight Latino adolescents. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(8):1542–8.
12. Lee S, et al. Effects of aerobic versus resistance exercise on abdominal fat and insulin sensitivity in obese adolescent boys. Diabetes. 2012;61(11):2787–95.
13. Ruiz JR, Castro‑Piñero J, España‑Romero V, et al. Field-based fitness assessment in young people: the ALPHA health-related fitness test battery. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(6):518–24.
14. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(1):1–11.
15. Fühner T, Kliegl R, Granacher U, et al. An update on secular trends in physical fitness of children and adolescents. SportsMed. 2021;51(2):303–20.
16. Tomkinson GR, et al. Temporal trends in handgrip strength of 2,216,320 children and adolescents (1967–2017). SportsMed. 2020;50(6):1129–51.
17. Ramírez‑Vélez R, et al. Handgrip strength cut-off for cardiometabolic risk in youth. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42622.
18. Merz KE, Thurmond DC. Role of skeletal muscle in insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis. Compr Physiol. 2020;10(3):785–809.
19. DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D. Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 2):S157–63.
20. Nguyen VH. School-based exercise interventions and bone health in youth. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018;4(2):53–60.
21. Zhang W, et al. Effects of exercise on bone mass and metabolism in adolescents: systematic review and meta‑analysis. Front Physiol. 2024;15:1512822.
22. M982 Excalibur — cost data according to budget documents and studies (e.g. estimates of USD 70–150 thousand/unit depending on the year and series).
23. US Government Accountability Office. F‑35 Sustainment: Costs Continue to Rise While Planned Use Declines (GAO‑24‑106703). 2024.